JUDGEMENT OF THE HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF DELHI IN THE CASE TITLED “DIRECTORATE OF ENFORCEMENT VS. RAJIV SAXENA, (2020) 06 DEL CK 0033” CONCERNING OFFENCES UNDER PREVENTION OF MONEY LAUNDERING ACT

 

NAME		MOBILE NO.	E-MAIL I’D
RANJEET KUMAR		8383098478, 9667769795	rk@courtkutchehry.com
JAI THAKUR		8130703334, 9355723300	jai.thakur@courtkutchehry.com
RAJEEV RANJAN		9334553249	rajiv.ranjan@courtkutchehry.com
ASHOK MISHRA		9718327746	sales@courtkutchehry.com
RAVI KUMAR			ravi.singh@courtkutchehry.com

Directorate Of Enforcement vs. Rajiv Saxena, (2020) 06 DEL CK 0033

PARA NO. 14

14. Learned ASG also sought to submit that the certificate, dated 18th October, 2019, of the learned Special Counsel (who, by virtue of Section 46 of the PMLA, is deemed to be a “public prosecutor”) could not be faulted for being unreasoned. I do not deem it necessary to enter into this issue, as the said certificate – as reproduced hereinabove – invokes, by reference, the contents of the application preferred, by the petitioner, before the learned Special Judge for revocation of the pardon granted to the respondent, and the reasons, for seeking certain revocation, are set out, in exhaustive detail, in the application. It cannot, therefore, in my view, be sought to be contended that the certificate, dated 18th October, 2019, was not reasoned.